ASTM E180-03 - 1.10.2003
 
Significance and Use

All test methods require statements of precision and bias. The information for these statements is generated by an interlaboratory study (ILS). This practice provides a specific design and analysis for the study, and specific formats for the precision and bias statements. It is offered primarily for the guidance of task groups having limited statistical experience.

It is recognized that the use of this simplified procedure will sacrifice considerable information that could be developed through other designs or methods of analyzing the data. For example, this practice does not afford any estimate of error to be expected between analysts within a single laboratory. Statements of precision are restricted to those variables specifically mentioned. Task groups capable of handling the more advanced procedures are referred to the literature (1, 2, 3, 5, 13)4 and specifically to Practice E 691, the current Committee E11 practice for interlaboratory studies. The latter includes graphical display and interpretation of ILS data.

The various parts appear in the following order:
Part AGlossary.
Part BPreliminary Studies.
Part CPlanning the Interlaboratory Study.
Part DTesting for Outlying Observations.
Part EStatistical Analysis of Collaborative Data.
Part FFormat of Precision Statements.
Part GBias (Systematic Error).
Part HPresentation of Data.

 
1. Scope

1.1 This practice establishes uniform standards for expressing the precision and bias of test methods for industrial and specialty chemicals. It includes an abridged procedure for developing this information, based on the simplest elements of statistical analysis. There is no intent to restrict qualified groups in their use of other techniques.

1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

1.3 In this practice, the vocabulary and guidelines for calculation and interpretation of statistical data according to the ISO are followed as closely as possible. Particular reference is made to ISO 5725, Parts 1 to 6.

 
2. Referenced Documents

D1013-93(1998)

Standard Test Method for Determining Total Nitrogen in Resins and Plastics (Withdrawn 2007)

D1727-60T(1976)

Method of Test for Urea Content of Nitrogen Resins (Withdrawn 1982)

ISO 5725

Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurements and results

E1169-21

Standard Practice for Conducting Ruggedness Tests

E691-23

Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method

E456-13a(2022)

Standard Terminology Relating to Quality and Statistics (Includes all amendments and changes 4/21/2022).

E178-21

Standard Practice for Dealing With Outlying Observations

E177-20

Standard Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods

E29-22

Standard Practice for Using Significant Digits in Test Data to Determine Conformance with Specifications